WASHINGTON (AP) — In a significant legal ruling, U.S. District Judge Paul Friedman decided to halt the Trump administration’s policy that curtailed journalists’ access to the Pentagon. This decision aligns with The New York Times’ stance that parts of the policy contravene legal standards.
Judge Friedman, operating out of Washington, D.C., found the Pentagon’s policy to unlawfully limit press credentials for journalists who opted to leave the premises instead of adhering to the new guidelines. The New York Times had filed a lawsuit against the Pentagon and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, arguing that the policy infringes on constitutional rights including free speech and due process.
The majority of the current Pentagon press corps comprises conservative media entities that accepted the policy. However, journalists from organizations such as The Associated Press have persisted in covering military matters despite their opposition to the new rules.
Defense Department officials have intermittently allowed some legacy media reporters access to Pentagon briefings on Iran, although engagement with reporters like Eric Schmitt from The Times and Luis Martinez from ABC has been minimal.
Friedman, appointed by President Bill Clinton, emphasized that the policy fails to adequately inform journalists about which routine practices might lead to the loss of their press credentials. He declared it a violation of First and Fifth Amendment rights, stating that the suppression of political speech endangers national security.
Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell expressed disagreement with the ruling on X, indicating plans to appeal immediately.
New York Times Praises Legal Decision
Charlie Stadtlander, a spokesperson for The New York Times, celebrated the ruling’s confirmation of press freedom rights. Stadtlander highlighted the public’s right to understand government actions and military decisions funded by taxpayer money.
The Times’ attorney, Theodore Boutrous, viewed the decision as a potent opposition to the Pentagon’s attempt to restrict press freedom during wartime.
Judge Friedman ordered the reinstatement of press credentials for seven Times journalists. The decision impacts all entities subjected to the policy.
The Pentagon Press Association, representing AP reporters, called for the immediate return of credentials to all its members, describing the day as a victory for press freedom.
The Defense Department has defended the policy as a safeguard against national security information leaks. Government attorneys argued the rules aim to restrict access to those posing security risks.
Conversely, Times attorneys accused the policy of seeking to suppress unfavorable media coverage of President Trump’s administration, arguing that such arbitrary power could lead to self-censorship.
Judge Criticizes Bias in Journalist Selection
Friedman acknowledged the necessity of protecting national security, troop safety, and war strategy. However, he underscored the importance of diverse information access, especially amidst military actions in Venezuela and ongoing conflict with Iran.
The judge identified the policy as a tool for excluding journalists deemed unfavorable to the government, labeling it illegal viewpoint discrimination.
Friedman criticized the policy for lacking clear guidelines, leaving journalists uncertain about how to maintain their credentials while performing their duties.
Immediate Compliance Required from Pentagon
The Pentagon had requested a suspension of the ruling to allow for an appeal, which Friedman denied. He instead demanded a report on compliance within a week.
The Times highlighted inconsistent rule application by the Pentagon, noting that right-wing figure Laura Loomer, despite seemingly breaching policy, faced no objection, unlike a similar Washington Post initiative.
Friedman found no substantial difference between the two cases, criticizing the policy’s lack of explicit guidelines preventing disparate treatment.
__
Associated Press writers Konstantin Toropin in Washington and David Bauder in New York contributed to this report.
