The Supreme Court silently enabled Trump to dismantle the Department of Education via mass staff firings, bypassing Congress, sparking debate on unchecked presidential power.
The Fifth Circuit recently examined W.M.M. v. Trump, challenging Trump’s use of the Alien Enemies Act against alleged Venezuelan gang members. This case tests if courts can scrutinize presidential military judgments, exploring the balance between national security and civil liberties, with historical parallels to WWII internments.
Local election officials worry about reduced federal support for election security, urging state and local aid.
The Constitution protects workers when properly interpreted, but it is essential for labor to actively fight for it.
The influx of money comes as the administration is resisting congressional oversight of conditions at ICE facilities.
In the 2024 election, political advertisers spent $1.9 billion on Meta, Google, Snap, and X. Despite voluntary disclosures, data gaps persist, underscoring transparency needs.
The Senate, on July 1, moved against a 10-year freeze on state AI regulations with a 99–1 vote. This provision, part of a broader budget bill, posed risks to state autonomy in AI governance without presenting a federal alternative. The ban could invalidate over 149 state laws, potentially leaving AI unchecked. Critics, including advocacy groups and state officials, warned against this plan, emphasizing the need for state-led innovation and protection against AI-driven misinformation in elections. The decision highlights a pivotal moment in balancing AI innovation with regulation.
The Supreme Court has extended the power of a lawbreaking president, offering an even longer leash.
Using soldiers for routine law enforcement threatens American democracy. Note: do not need #. Change # into html h3 tag.
People in prison face increased risks during heat waves and climate disasters; advocates should seek state solutions.
In a controversial move, President Trump ordered a military strike on Iran without congressional authorization, testing limits on presidential power. Congress’s muted response raises concerns about the erosion of legislative oversight, as lawmakers introduced a resolution to reassert their authority over military actions, highlighting the tension between executive ambition and constitutional checks and balances.
As June approaches, speculation about Supreme Court retirements intensifies. Justices’ strategic retirements can shape the Court’s future and legal landscape, driven by political motives. Proposals for term limits could curb this, ensuring impartial justice and restoring public trust in the Court’s integrity.
