Top Court Affirms Verdicts Against Tunisian Opposition Figures
The highest judicial authority in Tunisia has confirmed the convictions of numerous key opposition members, lawyers, and human rights advocates, upholding prison terms that could extend up to 45 years. This decision by the Court of Cassation was reported by Tunisia’s state news agency TAP, citing judicial sources on Thursday night.
The case, which has attracted significant global scrutiny, has intensified apprehensions regarding the state of judicial autonomy and political liberties in Tunisia. This legal action is seen as part of a larger campaign initiated by President Kais Saied, who has been consolidating power since July 2021 after suspending the parliament, dismissing the government, and assuming rule by decree.
Families of the accused, represented by Faiza Rahem, the spouse of imprisoned activist Issam Chebbi, have declared a shift in their legal strategy to a political battle. Rahem emphasized their ongoing commitment, stating, “After four years of harassment and persecution, we will continue defending the detainees. We will not tire or give up.” She noted that increased repression has only fueled their determination.
The defendants faced charges such as conspiracy against national security, forming terrorist organizations, and attempting to alter the governmental structure, all of which they have denied. Their legal representation has consistently contested the legitimacy of the charges and the legal process.
Presidential Justification for Legal Actions
President Saied has justified these legal proceedings as measures necessary to safeguard national security and to bring to justice those he accuses of undermining state stability. He has labeled some of his adversaries as “traitors” and “terrorists,” attributing to them intentions of inciting social disruption.
Amidst accusations of stifling opposition, Saied continues to assert that his actions are aimed at eradicating corruption and defending Tunisia from external threats. Meanwhile, defense lawyers have criticized the swift scheduling of the court hearing, which provided them only a brief three-day notice.
International Reactions and Concerns
Prominent political figures such as Ahmed Nejib Chebbi, Chaima Issa, and others are among those sentenced. The legal saga has seen some defendants endure lengthy pretrial detentions, while others, initially granted bail, were later detained to fulfill their sentences post-appeal.
Amnesty International has urged the Court of Cassation to annul the sentences, branding the trial as politically motivated and highlighting numerous procedural and rights violations. The organization has raised alarms over the declining health of several prisoners, exacerbated by inadequate prison conditions and extreme weather conditions. Haifa Chebbi, daughter of 82-year-old defendant Ahmed Nejib Chebbi, reported her father’s deteriorating health, including breathing difficulties and severe fatigue.
