Trump Administration Faces Over 200 Legal Challenges in Its First 100 Days
The second Trump administration, in its initial 100 days, has faced more than 200 federal lawsuits challenging its actions, with at least 149 successful in initial proceedings. These legal battles highlight a broader trend: the administration’s efforts to expand executive power, potentially bypassing Congress’s constitutional authority.
The U.S. Constitution grants Congress—rather than the president—the authority to enact laws, allocate funds, and shape government policy because Congress is directly accountable to the public. As James Madison articulated, the success of the government relies significantly on Congress’s connection with the people. The president’s role is to execute laws passed by Congress.
Three major actions by the administration, each facing legal challenges, exemplify this shift: the removal of independent agency heads, impounding federal funds, and shutting down federal agencies.
Controversial Removal of Independent Agency Leaders
The administration’s dismissal of heads from agencies such as the National Labor Relations Board and the Federal Trade Commission, without congressional justification, sparked legal disputes. These firings challenge the long-established tenure protections set by Congress to preserve agency independence. Pending Supreme Court involvement could redefine the president’s authority over agency appointments.
Impoundment of Federal Funds Stirs Legal Battles
In an unusual move, the Office of Management and Budget, under Trump appointees, attempted a government-wide impoundment of trillions of dollars already allocated by Congress. The action stalled crucial services, leading courts to temporarily block the freeze, citing it as a violation of Congress’s power over federal spending.
Despite court orders, the administration persisted in withholding funds, indicating ongoing attempts to reallocate federal spending without congressional approval. These efforts are reflected in numerous cases moving through judicial systems.
Efforts to Shut Down Federal Agencies
The Trump administration aimed to dismantle agencies like the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, established by Congress post-2008 financial crisis. By replacing leadership and ceasing operations, the administration confronted court challenges that cited overreach and constitutional violations.
Recent judicial opinions criticized the administration for overstepping authority, emphasizing that such actions undermine Congress’s legislative role.
These legal proceedings illustrate pivotal issues for U.S. governance. The administration’s actions, perceived as an attempt to marginalize congressional oversight, reflect concerns about an unchecked executive, echoing fears of a presidency with king-like powers.
