In recent years, federal courts have consistently moved away from safeguarding voting rights, yet they have maintained a firm stance against modifying election outcomes after votes have been cast. A significant development reinforcing this stance occurred with a recent ruling that upheld the results of a North Carolina Supreme Court election.
This ruling has implications beyond North Carolina, serving as a stern warning to individuals contemplating the alteration of election results in 2026: such attempts are destined to fail. The judgment sends a powerful signal about the judiciary’s unwillingness to entertain post-election subversion efforts.
To explore more about this topic, you can read the full article at Time magazine >>
