October 8, 2026 9:14 am

Wisconsin Appeals Court Reinstates 2011 Anti-Union Law, Unions to Appeal

A Wisconsin court reinstated a 2011 anti-union law, sparking renewed legal battles. The law limits public employee rights.
Wisconsin’s appeals court overturns ruling striking down anti-union law

Wisconsin Appeals Court Revives Disputed Anti-Union Law

A Wisconsin appeals court reinstated the controversial 2011 law that curtailed collective bargaining rights for public workers, reversing a prior decision that had deemed it unconstitutional. This development marks a significant blow to unions and public sector employees, who are expected to challenge the ruling in the Wisconsin Supreme Court, now under liberal control.

The law, known as Act 10, remains in effect as the legal battle continues, maintaining its provisions for over a decade. Initially put forth by Republicans, the legislation ignited fierce opposition and massive protests statewide, making Wisconsin a focal point in the national debate over union rights.

Implemented under former Republican Gov. Scott Walker, Act 10 drastically limited public employees’ ability to negotiate wage increases and required them to contribute more towards health insurance and retirement benefits. Despite the uproar, the Republican-dominated Legislature passed the law, which has withstood numerous legal challenges since its inception.

Support and Opposition: Divergent Perspectives

Proponents argue the law grants local governments greater control over labor costs and prevents potential financial insolvency by mandating higher employee contributions. However, critics contend that it undermines schools and government agencies by stripping workers of essential rights to negotiate pay and working conditions.

Unions remain determined to contest the ruling, with Christina Brey, a spokesperson for the suing unions, emphasizing their commitment to restoring full collective bargaining rights. “Wisconsin is better when all employees have a say in our workplaces,” Brey stated, highlighting the unions’ resolve to pursue justice for public service workers.

Meanwhile, Scott Walker hailed the court’s decision as a victory for taxpayers, asserting that it benefits those who manage schools and government operations. Concurrently, all Democratic gubernatorial candidates have pledged to repeal the law if elected.

Legal Proceedings and Judicial Opinions

The lawsuit challenging Act 10 was filed by seven unions and three union leaders, arguing the law’s exemptions for firefighters and other public safety workers are unconstitutional. However, attorneys for the state maintain these exemptions are legally sound and have been previously upheld.

The appeals court, in a 2-1 decision, overturned a December 2024 ruling by Dane County Circuit Judge Jacob Frost, asserting the law does not breach constitutional equal protection requirements. The majority opinion emphasized deference to legislative fiscal policy decisions.

Judge Shelley Grogan, in a concurring opinion, questioned the lawsuit’s timing, suggesting it coincided with the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s shift to liberal control. She underscored the importance of judicial independence from political influences.

In contrast, Judge Lisa Neubauer dissented, supporting the lower court’s findings and criticizing the legislature for making arbitrary distinctions between public employees.

Share:

More Posts

Lombardo administration fell short on infant opioid care

Nevada Audit Finds Shortcomings in Infant Opioid Care Under Lombardo

A legislative audit criticized Nevada Gov. Joe Lombardo’s oversight of care plans for opioid-affected infants, revealing lapses in service documentation and monitoring, risking both infant welfare and federal funding. The audit, released in April, highlights the administration’s failure to address these issues, amid Nevada’s minimal progress in reducing overdose deaths.

Send Us A Message

Subscribe